Tuesday of the Fourth Week in Eastertide
Posté par diaconos le 27 avril 2021
The Father and I are ONE
# According to Philippe Rolland, the early Church Fathers were unanimous in affirming that this Gospel is the last of the four in time and that it was written by John. These were, in particular, Irenaeus of Lyon who died in 210, Clement of Alexandria who died in 211, and Origen who died in 245. Not to mention Marcion who died in 160, who is not a Church Father. This hypothesis is today rejected by most historians, who saw in this text the work of a Johannine community at the end of the first century, whose proximity to the events was debated.
This text is written in Greek, just like the other three canonical gospels, known as synoptics, but it differs from them in its composition, its poetic style, its theology, and probably in its sources, as well as in some singular episodes, such as the Wedding at Cana or the adulterous woman. In the Trinitarian doctrine, the Gospel according to John is the most important in terms of Christology, because it implicitly states the divinity of Jesus, whom it describes as the Word of God incarnate. The richness of the fourth Gospel has given rise to a great variety of cuttings or plans among exegetes. The majority of them agreed on a division into two parts: a prologue and an epilogue.
# Dedication is the act of consecrating an altar, temple, church, or other sacred building. It also refers to the inscription of books or other artifacts when these are specifically addressed or presented to a particular person This practice, which once was used to gain the patronage and support of the person so addressed, is now only a mark of affection or regard. In law, the word is used of the setting apart by a private owner of a road to public use. There is no authorized form for the dedication of a church in the reformed Church of England. A form was drawn up and approved by both houses of the convocation of Canterbury under Archbishop Tenison in 1712, and an almost identical form was submitted to convocation in 1715, but its consideration was not completed by the Lower House, and neither form ever received royal sanction..
From the Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John
The feast of the dedication of the Temple in Jerusalem was being celebrated. It was winter. Jesus was coming and going in the Temple under Solomon’s colonnade. The Jews surrounded him and said to him, « How long will you keep us waiting?
If you are the Christ, tell us openly! « Jesus answered them, « I told you, and you do not believe. The works that I do in my Father’s name are my testimony. But you do not believe, because you are not of my sheep. My sheep hear my voice; I know them, and they follow me.
I give them eternal life; they shall never perish, nor shall anyone snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one can snatch them out of the Father’s hand. The Father and I are ONE. (Jn 10, 22-30)
Jesus at the Feast of Dedication
This feast, called in Hebrew and Greek Renovation, Inauguration, Dedication, was instituted by Judas Maccabaeus, in memory of the restoration of the temple and the altar, after Antiochus Epiphanes had profaned them. It was celebrated for eight days, beginning on the 25th of the month of Kisleu, which corresponds to the month of December (Josephus Jewish Antiquities, XII, 7, 8). This feast being of human institution, there was not, for the Jews, the same obligation to attend it as for the other religious solemnities. But Jesus was willing to conform to all that was good and praiseworthy in the customs of his people, and he took the opportunity to make a final appeal to them before the Passover.
It was winter, the bad season, and Jesus gave his speech in Solomon’s portico. Between the feast of tabernacles and the feast of the dedication, two months had passed, about which John kept an absolute silence. Some thought that during this interval Jesus remained in Jerusalem and its surroundings (thus Bengel, Tholuck, Olshausen, Stier Lücke, Hengstenberg, Meyer, Weiss, Oltzmann).
But, others objected, was it probable that Jesus remained all this time in Jerusalem, exposed to the ambushes of his enemies whose hatred and murderous designs had more than once been declared against him ? After leaving Galilee, Jesus did not return to that province. The departure from Galilee reported by Luke (Lk 9, 51) was a solemn and public one; Jesus set out surrounded by a large company (Lk 10, 1). John explained that when Jesus went to the feast of tabernacles, he went secretly.
Luke placed the parable of the Good Samaritan in the middle of a narrative that presented Jesus travelling through southern Galilee, the place of which was the road from Jerusalem to Jericho, and the visit of Jesus to Martha and Mary, which took place in Bethany. After the Feast of Tabernacles, Jesus returned to Galilee. He brought back from Jerusalem the conviction that his appeals to the theocratic authorities had been definitively rejected, that his death was inevitable and imminent. Under this impression, he took leave of this province which had been the main field of his activity.
He then made the solemn departure whose tragic character Luke’s account has marked. He made his way slowly towards Jerusalem, evangelising southern Galilee and Perea. He made a short appearance in Jerusalem at the feast of the dedication, then returned to Perea, where he stayed until the approach of Passover. Jesus found in the hearts of his adversaries the cause of their unbelief : « You do not believe, because you are not of my sheep, and the proof that you are not is that my sheep know me and hear my voice, but you reject my words. »
If the words, « as I said unto you, » omitted by Codex Sinaiticus, B, are genuine, they must not be taken literally, for Jesus had not yet openly declared to His opponents, in His own words, that they were not of His sheep: but by tracing, in the allegory of verses 1-15, the characters of those who belong to Him, He had made it quite clear to His enemies that they were not of that number.
Jesus referred to his parable of the shepherd and the sheep, which he had spoken two months before, and negative critics were quick to draw conclusions against the historical truth of these discourses. But, as Meyer observes, this connection is explained by the fact that Jesus had in the meantime had no further dealings with his opponents and that he was for the first time in their presence. Jesus reminded the Jews of the healing he had accomplished during his previous stay in Jerusalem, six months earlier.
The characters which Jesus again noted in His sheep told the adversaries enough that they were not. What an intimate and living relationship Jesus established between Himself and His sheep! They hear his voice, that voice which is known and loved ; and I, he says, know them with all the love of the good shepherd; and they, because they know my voice, follow me. Then Jesus raised this relationship to a still more sublime height. .
Each of these three statements revealed the love of Jesus and founded the perfect assurance of his sheep. He does not say: I will give them, but I give them eternal life now. The life they draw from my communion will grow into eternity! Since they have eternal life, they will never perish. And though they are surrounded by enemies bent on their destruction, no one will take them from my hand.
To further increase the confidence he wished to inspire in his people, Jesus raised his thoughts to the almighty, eternal God, who is love because he is his Father. His sheep were given to him by his Father, and since he is greater and more powerful than all, who could ever take them from his hand?
Deacon Michel Houyoux
Links to other Christian websites
◊ Christian Truth : click here to read the paper → The Feast of Dedication – What is it ?
◊ Messianic Good news : click here to read the paper → Jesus at the Feast of Dedication
♥ Christ in the Feast of Tabernacles
Publié dans comportements, Histoire du Salut, Religion, Temps pascal | Pas de Commentaire »